The Game of Globel Politics

-


Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools






Global Politics is the process which makes decisions by powerful groups in the World. In fact, Politics is a game of power and it is a great art to prolong ruling and to rule the world. The game of global politics that the mighty play to hold their influence over the weak Nations and the global affairs of the world to seek a writ that “might is right”.
In international politics, diplomacy and economic relationships know no justice other than that which serves the national interest.
The Big powers have been claiming that they are working against cruelty to humans because of its deep sense of "humanity and high moral values". And if it did not intervene - it claims - then humanity would disappear from the face of the earth, and there would not remain any guarantee of peace for any poor and weak country in the world. If such sentiments are genuine, then why not apply these same values at home and relinquish the Red Indian land in their favors and return to your own old country which was your ancestral land?
America is a big claimer for freedom and democracy, but why the same time supports world’s worst authoritarian dictators and oppressive governments in past like Pakistan and Iran (King)?
America attacked on Iraq to dominate a region that is rich in oil, but the U.S. government claimed that Iraq was a threat to the United States on the pretext that Iraq could begin to use its alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction to aid terrorist groups. After attack is its claim proven?
Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian land, establishing illegal settlements, and use of force is not condemned by America, America is known as providing financial help in support of the military strength of Israel to maintain its illegal occupation of Palestinian lands, why America’s attitude toward Israel is different?
If you say that all to them, they will reply: What are you talking about? Have you lost your mind? Obviously, one cannot argue with this `it-was- another-matter' attitude,
So you can say them “Yes” you are right, it’s a dual standard based Diplomacy that “no justice other than that which serves the national interest”. Add to Google

Comments

Mary "Lizzie" said…
Your views are not without validity, my friend. As a citizen of the US I am appalled at the treatment of our Native Indian citizens. You're right, why don't we relinquish the lands stolen from them since the first English colonies claimed the land of their birth. Yes, we should not have dual standards, and we should not, (ourselves) insinuate ourselves into lands with a hidden agenda. All is not as it seems. There are greater injustices at work than what we are able to see. I am not happy about the atrocities committed by my government in the name of peace. And, I am not yet convinced that the current administration is taking my country in a direction that is in the best interest of it's citizens. However, I shall wait and see, but I will not be blind to the actions of my country's leaders. Many of us have had a wake-up call (as expressed by the "tea-bagging" demonstrations last week). Today is sooner, and the best we can do at this time, but later, even tomorrow, is not soon enough in my opinion.
19 April 2009 at 03:58
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From Regional Tensions to a Possible Third World War

-
Image
The US deep state’s attack on Iran is apparently only about security or regional politics. But in reality, it is part of a larger strategy designed to destabilize the entire regional economy of the Middle East, Asia, and beyond. This instability is not accidental. Economic pressure, sanctions, and military tensions weaken regional cooperation, disrupt trade routes, increase oil price volatility, and slow development. As tensions grow, more countries are gradually drawn into the conflict, forming opposing political and military camps. This pattern resembles how global alliances formed before earlier world wars. There is also concern that Europe could eventually become involved, whether through military alliances, economic fallout, or energy dependence. If that happens, the conflict would no longer be regional—it could become global, raising fears of a much larger war, potentially a third world war. A key factor behind this analysis is the rapid rise of China as a major global power. As ...
Read more

Strait of Hormuz Tensions: A Threat to Global Energy and Food Security

-
Image
The Middle East war is expanding. Australia has also jumped into this war in favour of the U.S. and Israel, and many European countries are supporting Israel and the United States against Iran. As the situation develops, the United States cannot declare victory unless the Strait of Hormuz is reopened. However, Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, has pledged to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed. Because of this, Iran has a plan to increase oil prices in the international market in order to raise the war expenditures of the United States, Israel, and their allies. The U.S. does not have a clear plan to control these prices; therefore, the war is now turning into a global economic disaster. Oil prices are soaring, and major inflation is rising rapidly across the world as supply chains are affected. In the coming months, the fertilizer market—especially urea and nitrates—could be profoundly disrupted due to the ongoing war. Production may decline, affecting the agriculture sector ...
Read more

The world is entering a phase of deeply entrenched conflicts

-
Image
As conflicts escalate in the Middle East, this war is spreading from a regional conflict to a global one, and tensions are rising worldwide, entering a phase with no point of return without a major global disaster. Recently, the United States approved $9 billion in arms sales to Taiwan, prompting China to increase its Air Force and Navy presence around the island. At the same time, North Korea launched multiple ballistic missiles, further raising regional concerns. During a press conference, Tulsi Gabbard, speaking on U.S.intelligence matters,told the Congressional Intelligence Committee that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and Pakistan are developing advanced missile systems capable of carrying nuclear and conventional warheads, potentially reaching the U.S. mainland. Many Pakistani analysts question why India was not included, despite its capabilities, and why Pakistan’s name was grouped with other U.S. adversaries. Does the U.S. deep state view Pakistan as a potential concern i...
Read more